That is kind of dissapointing that the DSC-T200's screen contains the same amount of pixels as the DSC-T-70's, because it probably won't be as crisp. But despite that the DSC-T200 does have a wider capture range and a greater zoom. I personally am awed by the DSC-T200's large 3.5" screen, despite the fact it that it may not be as sharp as the DSC-T70's 3". It gives one more room to manuever when taking pictures, being able to press commands and see a larger picture. The question is is it worth the extra $100.
Also, Sony has already had a series of 3" touchscreen cameras, the DSC-N1 & DSC-N2. If anything, apple ripped off of sony's technology. But this is very unlikey because the two companies' goals concerning touchscreens are not very similar. In this case, apple is advertising a phone and apple is advertising a camera; they have totally different purposes.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Kevin @ Sep 2nd 2007 11:36PM
That is kind of dissapointing that the DSC-T200's screen contains the same amount of pixels as the DSC-T-70's, because it probably won't be as crisp. But despite that the DSC-T200 does have a wider capture range and a greater zoom. I personally am awed by the DSC-T200's large 3.5" screen, despite the fact it that it may not be as sharp as the DSC-T70's 3". It gives one more room to manuever when taking pictures, being able to press commands and see a larger picture. The question is is it worth the extra $100.
Also, Sony has already had a series of 3" touchscreen cameras, the DSC-N1 & DSC-N2. If anything, apple ripped off of sony's technology. But this is very unlikey because the two companies' goals concerning touchscreens are not very similar. In this case, apple is advertising a phone and apple is advertising a camera; they have totally different purposes.