[Jason Brown @ May 28th 2007 3:09AM]

Back in the 80's and early 90's the k1000 was the most popular manual slr in schools. it was designed so the most rookie of photographers could learn the craft. Now, with digital slr the craft has slightly diminished in favor of a digital quality. Similar to die-hard lp fans switching to cds. I personally have not used a manual for years but have a k1000 ready for when I decide to get into it again. I will not be using a digital as 90% of taking pictures is in understanding how a manual camera works. It's certainly not a preference as digital is great to look at but not as fun to take. I do use a rebel xt at work and its the best beginner digital slr available for its price.

[Leoedin @ May 28th 2007 3:13AM]

Why is it that people try and tell themselves that you "Can't understand how pictures work" with digital. What's different? The sensor is a substitute for film, with slightly different characteristics and changable ISO. You still need to understand how light works, how the fstop effects the exposure etc. The fact that these cameras have an auto mode doesn't mean you have to use it, and using the cameras is "Not understanding light"

[Jason Brown @ May 28th 2007 6:18AM]

why are you asking me? I don't know why the majority of digital users have the auto on! If you think those 2 or 3 differences mean anything then you haven't done enough manual work which also includes developing. here's a question for you....why is it that people tell themselves that "they can understand how pictures work with digital"? digital cameras use some kind of drive to replace the film not a sensor. using the camera is "not understanding light"...what are you a Buddhist monk or something. try to explain yourself instead of being all philosophical with bad grammar.

Before you get all smart on me, remember I never said I didn't like digital. I said I would go back to the manual slr I already have. Instead of replying to me just say your 1 1/2 cents in the forum.