Skip to Content
it's funny that this is supposed to be $589 when the Leica version (C-Lux 3) is supposed to be $499 when it launches. I'd tag this a little closer to $449 since the Lumix versions of the Leicas are cheaper in general.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
schlomo @ Mar 23rd 2007 3:27PM
it's funny that this is supposed to be $589 when the Leica version (C-Lux 3) is supposed to be $499 when it launches. I'd tag this a little closer to $449 since the Lumix versions of the Leicas are cheaper in general.