Casio has a thinner ones. Both the Casio S600 and S770 are 0.68 and 0.7 thick respectively. I have the S600 myself and trust me it is very thin. Heres your proof. http://exilim.casio.com/
Wow, you guys truly are dense. Of course Casio has thinner cameras, as do a number of other manufacturers. None of those have a 7x zoom. Do any even have over a 3x zoom? That is the feature that makes this camera something interest. Please read it more carefully. And next time you post a link how about actually posting to the actual product that is thinner not just a corporate home page.
And Resource, I will try to relax, I am sorry. I am aware of the ex v7, which is thin, at 25.1mm (.988 inches). I am not taking aay from that product or its merits. But I thought we were talking about The Thinnest, not just thin. The V7 is about 20% thicker than this new one. That is what makes it an achievement.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Casio has a thinner ones. Both the Casio S600 and S770 are 0.68 and 0.7 thick respectively. I have the S600 myself and trust me it is very thin. Heres your proof. http://exilim.casio.com/
Wow, you guys truly are dense. Of course Casio has thinner cameras, as do a number of other manufacturers. None of those have a 7x zoom. Do any even have over a 3x zoom? That is the feature that makes this camera something interest. Please read it more carefully. And next time you post a link how about actually posting to the actual product that is thinner not just a corporate home page.
And Resource, I will try to relax, I am sorry. I am aware of the ex v7, which is thin, at 25.1mm (.988 inches). I am not taking aay from that product or its merits. But I thought we were talking about The Thinnest, not just thin. The V7 is about 20% thicker than this new one. That is what makes it an achievement.