Casio has a thinner ones. Both the Casio S600 and S770 are 0.68 and 0.7 thick respectively. I have the S600 myself and trust me it is very thin. Heres your proof. http://exilim.casio.com/
Wow, you guys truly are dense. Of course Casio has thinner cameras, as do a number of other manufacturers. None of those have a 7x zoom. Do any even have over a 3x zoom? That is the feature that makes this camera something interest. Please read it more carefully. And next time you post a link how about actually posting to the actual product that is thinner not just a corporate home page.
And Resource, I will try to relax, I am sorry. I am aware of the ex v7, which is thin, at 25.1mm (.988 inches). I am not taking aay from that product or its merits. But I thought we were talking about The Thinnest, not just thin. The V7 is about 20% thicker than this new one. That is what makes it an achievement.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
eshaq786 @ Feb 9th 2007 9:04PM
Casio has a thinner ones. Both the Casio S600 and S770 are 0.68 and 0.7 thick respectively. I have the S600 myself and trust me it is very thin. Heres your proof. http://exilim.casio.com/
Justin @ Feb 10th 2007 1:08PM
Wow, you guys truly are dense. Of course Casio has thinner cameras, as do a number of other manufacturers. None of those have a 7x zoom. Do any even have over a 3x zoom? That is the feature that makes this camera something interest. Please read it more carefully. And next time you post a link how about actually posting to the actual product that is thinner not just a corporate home page.
And Resource, I will try to relax, I am sorry. I am aware of the ex v7, which is thin, at 25.1mm (.988 inches). I am not taking aay from that product or its merits. But I thought we were talking about The Thinnest, not just thin. The V7 is about 20% thicker than this new one. That is what makes it an achievement.