Not really impressed with this review. It's not very detailed, and sounds like it's reciting the press release. "Images are good, low noise, no CA..." in just about as many words.
One of the big advantages of a DSLR with a larger-than-consumer-cam sensor is the ability to control DOF. So far, Four-thirds hasn't shown it's up to that task, definitely not when compared with APS-C or full-frame. I'd consider saving money and getting one of the image-stabilized ultrazooms like the 12x zoom Panasonic DMC-FZ30 or Canon Powershot S2-IS.
If you want the real advantages of a DSLR, the Nikon D50 and Canon Digital Rebel XT are both within the $600-800 range, and benefit from a huge selection of real Nikon and Canon glass. Or you could go with the Sony DSC-R1, which does not have interchangeable lenses (so like the compact cams doesn't need a fancy dust remover), but has a real (near) APS-C sized sensor.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Foof @ Jan 21st 2006 6:24PM
Not really impressed with this review. It's not very detailed, and sounds like it's reciting the press release. "Images are good, low noise, no CA..." in just about as many words.
One of the big advantages of a DSLR with a larger-than-consumer-cam sensor is the ability to control DOF. So far, Four-thirds hasn't shown it's up to that task, definitely not when compared with APS-C or full-frame. I'd consider saving money and getting one of the image-stabilized ultrazooms like the 12x zoom Panasonic DMC-FZ30 or Canon Powershot S2-IS.
If you want the real advantages of a DSLR, the Nikon D50 and Canon Digital Rebel XT are both within the $600-800 range, and benefit from a huge selection of real Nikon and Canon glass. Or you could go with the Sony DSC-R1, which does not have interchangeable lenses (so like the compact cams doesn't need a fancy dust remover), but has a real (near) APS-C sized sensor.