Me? I like a viewfinder - despite what they and everyone else says, those LCD screens just aren't as easy to use as good old eye-through-the-camera usability. Sure you have to make allowances for parallax and the like but ultimately it is so much quicker - plus holding a camera against your face reduces shake. As for "sluggish low-light performance", this is a real shame as the best pictures are often those in low light (ever take a great pic with flash as your main light source? Very difficult to do as it kills most images dead).
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Me? I like a viewfinder - despite what they and everyone else says, those LCD screens just aren't as easy to use as good old eye-through-the-camera usability. Sure you have to make allowances for parallax and the like but ultimately it is so much quicker - plus holding a camera against your face reduces shake. As for "sluggish low-light performance", this is a real shame as the best pictures are often those in low light (ever take a great pic with flash as your main light source? Very difficult to do as it kills most images dead).